“Framingham investigators seemed to be objective in their early reports but subsequently exhibited stronger and stronger biases. The use of such terms as ‘powerful’ to describe an exceedingly weak relationship has been commonplace. One kind of bias exhibited was the process of reinterpreting data in order to be consistent with the current position of the alliance (the group providing the funding; i.e., the NHLBI).” —Russell Smith
Read MoreThe Framingham Heart Study, Part 3: Framingham’s Presentational Flaws—Bias or Fraud?What will inevitably doom a physical training program and dilute a coach’s efficacy is a lack of commitment to fundamentals.
Read the 2005 letter from Greg GlassmanFundamentals, Virtuosity and Mastery